James Lyons-Weiler (@lifebiomedguru on Twitter): I gave the vaccine manufacturers all the information that they needed to exclude specific parts of the protein They’re literally programming what the protein is going to be included in the rna vaccines They could have recoded it and should have recoded it and we might not see things like the heart effects happening the myocarditis and pericarditis

Source: https://www.spreaker.com/show/global-research-news-hour

@ 24:14

24:14
problems you know this kind of thing so
24:16
what are you saying this is like
24:17
standard procedure that you go through
24:19
all of that with
24:20
with the uh the different
24:23
aspects of it that’s uh to do avoid
24:26
autoimmune reactions
24:28
actually it’s not no it’s not i was
24:30
proposing in my paper that it should be
24:32
it should be it was presenting the
24:34
evidence that there’s a problem so the
24:35
vaccine manufacturers had a chance and
24:37
moderna
24:38
while i was doing my analysis maternity
24:40
came out and said listen we made it we
24:41
made the vaccine in 72 hours we’re done
24:44
pfizer had waited a few months and
24:46
visor’s mrna vaccine if you look at the
24:48
mrna sequence from the physio vaccine is
24:50
very very different
24:51
at the rna level
24:53
it probably still encodes many of the
24:55
same amino acids but i did an analysis
24:58
after the publication when stanford
25:00
university published the mrna sequence
25:03
of the viral proteins from
25:05
the the spike protein in the pfizer
25:07
vaccine
25:09
it has fewer unsafe epitopes than the
25:11
modern what i’ve called unsafe epitopes
25:14
they’re unsafe because they match in
25:15
their proteins and they’re predicted to
25:17
cause autoimmunity
25:19
now that paper of mine
25:21
was
25:22
[Music]
25:24
tied i think i have to say it was tied
25:25
with an italian researcher who came out
25:27
and also proposed that you know
25:29
um
25:30
[Music]
25:31
viral proteins in the cytoskeleton might
25:34
might be a problem due to autoimmunity
25:36
but this was a
25:38
more general proposal mine was a very
25:40
specific detailed surgical analysis
25:42
and in that surgical analysis i gave the
25:44
vaccine manufacturers all the
25:46
information that they needed to exclude
25:47
specific parts of the protein they’re
25:49
literally programming what the protein
25:51
is going to be
25:52
included in the rna
25:54
viruses or vaccines sorry
25:57
they could have recoded it
26:00
and should have recoded it and we might
26:02
not see things like um the heart effects
26:05
happening the
26:07
myocarditis and pericarditis in fact one
26:09
of the proteins
26:11
that i’ve found was titan and titan is a
26:15
is a
26:16
a heart muscle protein that has a very
26:19
very very tight match to osaru’s cop2
26:22
spike protein epitope
26:25
and had they excluded that particular
26:27
repertoire changed it just a few amino
26:29
acids perhaps we wouldn’t be seeing the
26:31
myocarditis and pericarditis darja khan
26:34
duke and others have looked at titans
26:36
and then their own analysis and
26:38
confirmed it
26:39
well something that happened that i
26:40
didn’t expect uh harvard university of
26:43
boston general hospital and others
26:45
decided to challenge my assertions and
26:47
test my hypotheses that perhaps these
26:49
things could cause autoimmunity
26:52
and the study came out of jadani at all
26:55
in the lab where they were looking at
26:57
their assay at a particular aspect of
27:00
the biology of these proteins
27:02
and then they found that yes we were
27:04
likely to get cross-reaction
27:07
uh with human proteins and viral
27:09
proteins very likely and they you know i
27:12
had i had neglected to include
27:14
mitochondrial proteins i didn’t think
27:16
about that they included mitochondria
27:17
approaches they found even more matches
27:19
between starscrafted proteins
27:22
so
27:23
what i was really trying to do was i was
27:24
trying to provide a pathway to safety
27:27
but
27:28
you know
27:29
create a do it in a very
27:31
careful way where i didn’t you know i
27:33
wasn’t characterized as being
27:35
anti-vaccine because i thought perhaps
27:36
vaccines could be made safer than being
27:38
made
27:39
and like you said there was a cascade of
27:41
studies that came out after that many
27:43
many many many many studies cited my
27:46
work it’s the most cited work that i
27:47
have i think where i’m a single author
27:50
anyway
27:51
um
27:52
and
27:53
you know uh the public paid for that
27:55
announcement but the public through
27:56
public donations i’m not sure that i
27:58
would have had time to write a grant
28:00
proposal to the nih to do some
28:02
bioinformatics so that i could help
28:04
you know as an independent research
28:05
scientist if i was still at a university
28:07
so
28:08
the ipac is you know carried its way
28:11
that way and i have more studies coming
28:13
i have more studies coming on the same
28:15
question
28:16
um for instance
28:19
one of the things we’re writing up right
28:20
now is an analysis of
28:22
to try to understand why the people that
28:24
get serious coping you know 78 or 79 80
28:29
a percent of the people that get serious
28:30
coveted walked into the infection with
28:33
prior autoimmunity
28:35
and so we know the proteins to their
28:37
body that they’re already attacking
28:39
these people have lupus or they have
28:40
asthma they have some other autoimmune
28:42
condition like that
28:44
um
28:45
so we know the proteins that their
28:47
immune system is already attacking their
28:49
self antigens
28:50
so what’s the match between the known
28:52
again you know self antigens in the
28:54
human uh condition called autoimmunity
28:57
and the virus and we’ve done that
28:58
analysis
29:00
and i found some very very interesting
29:02
things i had some very very interesting
29:04
hits and said well wait a minute here
29:06
are some things that we didn’t find with
29:07
the inverse analysis
29:09
and in my april 2020 paper i did not
29:13
claim or make any statement that this is
29:14
a comprehensive analysis of all of the
29:16
unsafe epitopes or all of the ways but
29:19
the interesting fact is
29:21
that um
29:23
there seems to be a genetic component to
29:25
risk of autoimmunity and it seems very
29:28
clear to me that if my let’s say my
29:30
titan protein in my heart has a one
29:33
amino acid or two amino acid difference
29:35
that makes it more similar to the viral
29:37
protein i might be genetically more
29:39
susceptible to
29:41
uh seeing autoimmunity
29:43
uh than other people who don’t have or
29:46
maybe someone has
29:47
in their type of protein and an amino
29:49
acid or to change away from the thyroid
29:51
protein compared to what you know kind
29:53
of the baseline or the average human
29:55
might have there’s such a thing
29:57
wow
29:58
yeah so so this could explain why we
30:00
have a genetic and environmental risk
30:03
that comes together
30:06
you’re listening to the global research
30:08
newshour broadcasting from ckuw 95.9 fm
30:12
in winnipeg and from partnering radio
30:14
stations across canada and the united
30:16
states
30:16
[Music]
30:21
could you talk about uh what you
30:23
referred to as pathogenic priming and
30:25
how that
30:27
became involved and that how the vaccine
30:31
could come and trigger the reaction that
30:33
you’re talking about
30:35
sure so one of the things that we know
30:36
about autoimmunity um is that uh like
30:40
rheumatoid arthritis people will go for
30:41
months even years and not have
30:44
a flare-up
30:45
with lupus they’ll be good for a long
30:48
period of time and for unknown reasons
30:50
they’ll simply flare up
30:51
and
30:52
it seems obvious and you know that when
30:54
your body starts producing antibodies
30:56
against a virus or a bacterial pathogen
30:59
um it’s doing what it’s supposed to do
31:01
but if those antibodies are around and
31:03
are present
31:04
and you are producing proteins that look
31:06
like the viral protein at that time
31:08
then you might experience a flare-up
31:11
it’s just kind of a one-to-one you know
31:13
no-brainer logic there and that’s what
31:15
is in fact what we see when we look at
31:17
cross-reactive antibody studies of
31:19
people with autoimmunity
31:21
and so
31:22
at the time that
31:24
um cyrus cop2 came out there was some
31:27
expressed concern
31:28
um
31:29
while my paper was under review there
31:31
was a paper that came out that proposed
31:33
perhaps there’s a concern over what’s
31:35
called disease enhancement specifically
31:38
antibody dependent
31:40
disease advancement in antibody
31:42
dependent disease enhancement you have a
31:45
person that is
31:46
already producing some type of antibody
31:48
that’s similar to the antibodies that
31:50
they would produce say against the virus
31:52
perhaps through vaccination or even
31:54
perhaps through
31:55
prior infection
31:57
and they’re already producing the effect
31:58
that but somehow
32:00
physically the antibody
32:03
creates a relation has a physical
32:05
relationship with the virus in a manner
32:07
that causes it to be more likely to
32:09
invade certain cells in the body
32:12
now the disease enhancement
32:14
um
32:15
was one phrase for it as a problem but
32:19
it’s a specific mechanism right the
32:22
antibody dependent disease enhancement
32:24
disease enhancement itself
32:26
was was not talked about for for years
32:29
it was talked about the 1960s and 70s
32:32
and even little in the 80s and then
32:34
somehow got changed into immune
32:36
enhancement
32:38
the word is disease enhancement it’s
32:40
hard to find until you get to
32:42
you know later on with covert 19 again
32:45
it came back because
32:47
the idea
32:48
that immune enhancement was the word was
32:51
the phrase that was being using struck
32:53
me as inaccurate and precise and harmful
32:55
because it was misleading it’s immune
32:58
enhancement sounds like something that
32:59
you drink vitamin c
33:02
drinks for or go out and get sunshine or
33:04
you know try to exercise to stay healthy
33:06
take supplements
33:07
so
33:09
you know words are very powerful when it
33:11
comes to understanding that’s all we
33:13
really have to be able to communicate
33:14
with each other so
33:16
the the the image that came to my mind
33:18
when i was thinking of doing the
33:19
analysis and thinking about what was
33:21
happening was that if in
33:23
studies for the stars virus
33:25
and the mers
33:26
coronavirus
33:28
they expose the animals right to
33:31
the
33:32
attenuated viruses
33:34
and then they infected the animals and
33:36
the animals died well it’s really clear
33:38
that the vaccine primed those animals to
33:40
die they didn’t die from immunopathology
33:43
for lungs
33:44
they didn’t die from respiratory
33:45
illnesses they died from pancreatitis
33:48
they died from kidney failure they died
33:50
from hepatitis they died from
33:51
inflammation you know they had
33:52
encephalopathy they they lived in the
33:54
brain so they died from conditions that
33:56
were not typical of stars and mars
33:58
infection
34:00
and so let me just just just to say so
34:03
basically when you talk about the the
34:05
this uh this auto immune reaction i mean
34:08
you we understand that they the the
34:11
anti-there’s
34:12
cells that go after the uh the actual
34:15
disease but they also go after
34:17
parts of your own body that have a i
34:19
guess a resemblance or something like
34:21
that and
34:24
this is it’s it’s happening to the the
34:25
pancreatic pancreas to the brain to
34:29
basically all other areas of the body as
34:32
well well no it would depend on the
34:34
animal depend on
34:35
yeah it would depend on which proteins
34:37
are most similar to whichever well see
34:40
the
34:40
the sars merge and cytos have more than
34:44
just one protein they have in my
34:47
analysis i found 55 in stars comp2 i
34:50
found 55 epitopes so there’s 55 ways to
34:54
develop antibodies potentially
34:56
for humans anyway my analysis is human
34:58
specific is this so those 55 ways could
35:01
impact
35:02
sorry yeah is this something that like
35:04
having 55 uh does that seem like an
35:07
unusually large number given the uh you
35:10
know
35:11
the
35:12
resemblance to the uh
35:14
to the
35:15
uh the body of the human body or is it
35:18
something hang on hang on so the 55 that
35:20
exists
35:22
are just immunogenic epithelium so every
35:24
protein in the cyrus virus except for
35:26
one is immunogenic okay that’s not
35:30
unusual because it’s a foreign protein
35:32
right so the analysis that i used it was
35:35
it’s a predictive analysis so then of
35:38
those 55 some had many matches against
35:41
human proteins and some had none there
35:43
was i think there was one immune genetic
35:45
epitope in the entire virus that was not
35:48
predicted to have an epidural that also
35:51
matched humans but there were other
35:52
epitopes in those proteins that that
35:54
didn’t match humans okay so no it’s not
35:57
unusual for a viruses size and sars
36:00
cough ii to have that many
36:02
immunogenic epidurals what i’m saying is
36:04
that
36:05
of the 55 that are there there’s 55 ways
36:08
that an animal or human you know could
36:10
develop an immune response
36:12
and that’s why natural immunity when you
36:14
get a cyrus cough to infection you have
36:17
55
36:18
redundant ways that you might be immune
36:21
as opposed to the spike protein the
36:23
spike protein only affords us five at
36:25
least from the
36:26
stream so
36:28
the what what the omicron or delta
36:30
variants have now i haven’t analyzed
36:32
that yet but proteins in the the
36:34
covalent
36:35
yeah yeah so the covalent box the coded
36:38
uh virus and the vaccine only have five
36:41
ways of giving you immunity and we’re
36:43
not i’m not really sure which ones are
36:45
most cross-reactive to humans but so you
36:47
know
36:49
i’m not sure which ones are most
36:50
effective if you will advancing an
36:52
in-body response
36:54
so to answer your question then
36:56
the um
36:58
the the the risk of pathogenic priming
37:02
was obvious
37:04
it really depends on which proteins they
37:06
chose if they chose mp3 they would have
37:08
had more pathogenic priming or disease
37:11
advancement is a potential form of
37:13
pathogenic priming so so the antibody
37:15
dependent disease enhancement so
37:17
pathogenic priming
37:18
my definition of it is that you have
37:21
exposed
37:22
an animal or a human being or something
37:24
with an immune system
37:25
to a
37:27
antigen source
37:29
right that then later on when you’re
37:31
re-exposed to an antigen source they
37:32
have a bad reaction a very simple
37:34
example of this is when you
37:36
eat a peanut butter sandwich after
37:38
getting exposed to aluminum peroxide
37:42
this is you know they develop
37:43
autoimmunity in animals routinely with
37:45
aluminum hydroxide
37:47
you take a rat or a mouse and you inject
37:49
them with aluminum hydroxide and then
37:51
inject them with peanut oil
37:53
and then try to feed that animal peanut
37:55
butter later they’ll develop anaphylaxis
37:57
unless you treat the endoplexes they’ll
37:58
die
37:59
so that is the priming pathogenic
38:02
priming
38:03
the immune system against its own body
38:05
your bias immune system the way that
38:07
causes disease in the individual if they
38:09
then see the protein again then it’s
38:11
really important to understand
38:13
that the liability if you will the
38:15
causal liability
38:17
is an attribute of the initial exposure
38:22
the human immune system
38:24
and the secondary exposure you need all
38:26
parts right it’s not as though they’re
38:28
saying that vaccines only can cause this
38:30
right vaccines might cause it while type
38:33
infections might cause it as well so
38:35
which one’s more likely
38:37
the problem with vaccination
38:39
in terms of pathogenic priming is that
38:41
you end up stacking all of your igg
38:44
antibodies all of it you get a massive
38:46
response that’s the goal of getting a
38:48
good you know we want a high antibody
38:50
response
38:51
uh well they measure that with igg
38:53
antibodies
38:55
and if they’re all stacked against the
38:56
same antigen source you’re getting a
38:58
very very strong immune response the
39:00
body basically thinks that it’s got
39:02
viruses everywhere that have this one
39:04
protein
39:05
and um
39:07
so
39:08
whereas with a natural infection with an
39:10
infection
39:12
if you can handle the infection well and
39:15
survive it uh then you have multiple
39:17
epitopes that are causing a diversity of
39:20
igg a diversity of igm and then you get
39:23
a diversity of b cells and a diversity
39:25
of t cells and then you have redundancy
39:27
in your immunity
39:29
and now we see a study that was just
39:32
published i wrote an article on
39:33
substance on my newsletter popular
39:36
rationalism
39:37
outlining that the data show that if you
39:41
have had a vaccine
39:43
and then you get an infection or if you
39:46
have
39:47
covet 19 and get a re-infection
39:50
that the vaccinated are 10.6 times more
39:53
likely to have serious coverage critical
39:56
clothing
39:57
or die
39:58
than
39:59
the people who have natural immunity in
40:01
that sense bachelor is superior but that

+++

40:01
that sense bachelor is superior but that
40:04
doesn’t mean that the vaccinated are at
40:06
higher risk overall
40:08
of dying
40:10
so we’ve got to be careful about what
40:11
we’re seeing here
40:12
so
40:13
scientifically
40:15
um pathogenic priming has that that idea
40:17
has taken root in the scientific
40:19
literature and ratified to see that i
40:21
just really wish that vaccine
40:22
manufacturers had i had reached them and
40:25
that the science had caught up to their
40:27
efforts to create a vaccine because
40:29
then the human pain and suffering that’s
40:31
happening
40:32
likely happening because
40:34
of exposure to viral proteins with
40:36
unsafe epitopes might have been reduced
40:39
and if we can’t do that with you know
40:42
upgrades to the vaccine they want to
40:44
chase omocron to the new vaccine well
40:46
hopefully they’ll take out the unsafe
40:47
epidurals if they can update it
40:50
then perhaps it looks not too late
40:53
wow um now you you you excuse me you you
40:57
mentioned uh things about uh for example
40:59
fauci uh you’re not really doing things
41:02
uh uh basically that um that there
41:07
the way this is has proceeded that uh
41:10
you you may have warned uh different
41:12
individuals about what’s proceeding from
41:15
this and you uh
41:17
you they didn’t react the way you you
41:19
would have hoped or or should have done
41:21
i mean
41:22
can i get a sense of of how you assert
41:25
that
41:26
these decisions by the health
41:28
authorities are being made
41:32
in at odds with
41:34
you know what the science says about it
41:37
you know i mean is it out of deliberate
41:39
malfeasance or is it just sort of a well
41:42
they’re so busy they’re not paying
41:43
attention
41:45
one of the things i’m really bad at
41:46
michael is guessing other people’s
41:48
motivations right
41:50
so there’s a black box behind anyone so
41:53
behind anyone’s eyes that you know
41:56
people can think when it’s flinting
41:59
but i did i did the same analysis for
42:02
zika
42:03
when niaid was funded by congress
42:07
billions of dollars for zika vaccine
42:09
that they all thought was going to be
42:11
necessary and that’s another mystery
42:13
because zika went away the year after it
42:15
came in after the vaccine money was
42:16
released it just went away
42:19
there was still
42:20
you know the zika infections were
42:22
happening but the microcephaly just went
42:24
away
42:25
in brazil
42:26
um
42:27
and i had actually traced the potential
42:29
cause of the microcephaly brazil to
42:32
an experimental
42:34
whole cell pertussis vaccine was being
42:36
used in the slums
42:38
uh in northeastern brazil i have emailed
42:41
correspondences from the scientists
42:43
there
42:44
uh called
42:46
diaz
42:48
her last name too it’s been a couple of
42:49
years um but anyway um
42:52
the money came towards the zika vaccine
42:54
and i thought okay well wait a minute
42:55
i’d better do this kind of analysis this
42:57
is before quote videos you know i better
42:59
have this kind of analysis done and then
43:01
i sent a letter to anthony cloud sheet
43:03
this is before everybody in anthony
43:05
thought she’s name
43:06
and i said
43:08
listen if you create a vaccine and you
43:11
include all of these separators in the
43:14
vaccine for zika
43:16
you may induce autoimmune encephalitis
43:19
autoimmune encephalopathy
43:22
and that could be bad because you know
43:25
if you’re going to vaccinate
43:26
pregnant women and they
43:28
develop antibodies
43:31
or children and they develop antibodies
43:33
and they match human brain proteins and
43:35
perhaps the pathophysic the
43:37
pathophysiology or the disease the
43:40
pathogenicity of the zika viral proteins
43:43
that cause problems during infection
43:46
might actually also happen during
43:48
injection and so i was giving them a
43:50
fair warning to say be careful
43:53
and i didn’t get a letter back not that
43:55
i’m not an egoist so i’m not really
43:57
concerned that i didn’t get a letter
43:58
back
43:59
but um the next week dr fauci
44:03
announced that they needed eight more
44:04
months to create the vaccine and he had
44:06
announced that they were going to have
44:07
it within weeks retired in my letter so
44:10
i was hopeful that perhaps you know we
44:12
had it off a disaster with you know
44:15
injecting unsafe proteins into people
44:19
but you know this
44:20
whole awareness now that’s happening
44:24
people because of the effort of myself
44:25
and others that are working on this and
44:27
many people have been working on
44:28
autoimmunity from viral groups and use
44:30
of pathogenic proteins for years longer
44:32
a bit longer before i much for decades
44:35
before i got involved
44:37
um
44:38
but now i think people are starting to
44:39
really appreciate that it’s important
44:40
not to compare the safety of the vaccine
44:42
in the bike and the virus which is safer
44:44
to like with a rounded infection or
44:45
injection but instead they entered into
44:48
it the unsafeness or the risk of being
44:51
exposed to viral proteins or pathogen
44:53
proteins if the unit of concern over
44:55
risk is the protein then you’re looking
44:57
at the entire dynamic
44:59
of the events that might happen
45:01
and that’s where i really flourish in
45:03
terms of things like machine learning
45:05
and you know multiple multiple pathways
45:07
of probability decision trees and all
45:09
that stuff because then we can say okay
45:11
if you have prior autoimmunity
45:13
you’re probably going to get serious
45:15
covalent if you get serious coven you
45:18
have a higher likelihood of death
45:20
so
45:21
what’s the best choice for you if you
45:23
have a
45:24
risk of serious coping well the
45:26
prevalence of the disease is low
45:30
if the prevalence of disease is low and
45:32
you take steps to protect yourself from
45:33
getting infected that’s probably a good
45:35
thing
45:36
if you if everybody with autoimmunity
45:39
vaccinates they’re all being exposed
45:41
potentially
45:42
so you’ve changed the probability of
45:44
being exposed to
45:46
unsafe proteins to 100
45:50
that’s why it’s really disturbing to me
45:51
that the goal of vaccinologists is to
45:53
vaccinate everyone with no exception so
45:55
australia just made an announcement that
45:58
they’re going to try to vaccinate
45:59
everyone uh austria
46:01
as well
46:02
there are no exceptions well
46:04
100 vaccination
46:07
means by definition you will find every
46:09
single person in that population that
46:11
cannot tolerate those
46:13
unsafe epitopes those unsafe proteins
46:15
were excipients in the vaccines people
46:17
are allergic to some of these things
46:19
so
46:20
you know
46:21
people really have to
46:22
just back off really literally back off
46:25
of
46:26
their over overreach their overarching
46:30
assumption that you know
46:32
it’s it’s one thing to say that we’re
46:33
all cookie cutters and one size fits all
46:36
no their entire premise of universal
46:39
vaccination during a pandemic is flawed
46:42
unless you have a vaccine that’s 100
46:44
percent effective
46:45
because then if you if you vaccinate
46:47
with a leaky vaccine
46:49
it is absolutely known
46:51
for especially for things like rhinos
46:56
respiratory or those or uh viruses
46:59
in animals say for chickens even
47:02
that if you vaccinate the peak of the
47:04
outbreak then the virus is going to
47:06
escape the vaccine
47:07
yeah it’s a foregone conclusion so the
47:10
madness is to me it’s it’s epidemiologic
47:13
medical madness that’s at play here is
47:16
what we answer to our investors we have
47:17
to you know we answered we’ve made such
47:20
an investment in the vaccine program we
47:21
have to keep going it’s the concord
47:23
films
47:24
that we still have science logic and
47:26
reason to use here right it’s not as
47:28
though we’ve given up on that
47:30
and the the the mantra follow the
47:33
science of all the science i’m all for
47:34
that but that
47:36
requires science requires skepticism
47:40
yeah if you say follow the science and
47:41
you’re not if you’re disallowing
47:42
skepticism you’re not
47:45
following science it’s the most ironic
47:48
kind of mantra that i’ve seen it seems
47:50
like there’s a lot of an emphasis is on
47:53
um
47:54
getting the experts in unison that the
47:57
vaccine is good and anyone who says wait
47:59
a second
48:00
they they they are marginalized if not
48:03
outright you know demonized as being a
48:06
anti-science or a maverick of some sort
48:10
um so i mean now now we’re looking at
48:12
the vaccination of children uh aged 5 to
48:16
11 and it seems to me that the risk is
48:17
very low of these uh children getting
48:20
the vaccine and yet these uh you know it
48:23
it’s coming down in such a way that i
48:25
mean our people are gonna be made to
48:26
feel guilty about not getting the
48:28
vaccine for their kids
48:29
uh i don’t know i mean can you uh you
48:31
know
48:32
go from there and say exactly how
48:35
this
48:36
vaccination program
48:38
is uh
48:41
you know going into the future is is
48:43
going to
48:44
demolish any opposition from people like
48:47
yourself or from you know all the other
48:49
figures who are starting to stand up and
48:51
and say something yeah well first of all
48:54
let’s let’s let’s go backwards sometime
48:56
rather than forward sometime on this
48:58
issue because the cdc website to this
49:01
day says the facts that children can
49:04
transmit
49:05
stars go up too but if you then look at
49:07
the three references they put up there
49:10
each of the three references that are on
49:12
the cdc website about you know stars ii
49:15
in schools
49:17
states clearly that it’s a hypothetical
49:19
concern it’s a theoretical concern
49:23
they state clearly that children may
49:25
and the uh the logic is that they have
49:27
high they can have high they can have
49:29
high billion if they’re infected
49:31
and therefore they may transmit that’s
49:34
not science that’s not data that’s not
49:36
transmission rate estimation
49:39
is it 14
49:40
is it 28 is it 30 is it eighty percent
49:44
you know if you have high viremia or
49:46
what what if you’re infected would have
49:48
been your innate immune system
49:51
dispenses with the virus handily
49:54
so it’s unfair i think it’s on the best
49:56
way that i can say it it’s unfair to put
49:58
the risk of the vaccine on the children
50:00
with no benefit to them
50:02
that’s absolutely medically wrong it’s
50:05
scientifically wrong from a research
50:06
perspective it’s wrong and then to
50:08
mandate it
50:09
to try to mandate this vaccine
50:12
where there’s all risk and no benefit is
50:14
a clear violation of the code of federal
50:16
regulations protecting the subject’s
50:18
research
50:19
it’s absolutely it’s it’s uh 45 cfr 46
50:23
you can look it up
50:24
so we have a ways to go people want me
50:27
to say that again because i said it so
50:28
fast 45 cfr 46. look it up look up the
50:32
common rule read the entire website
50:34
don’t just look at it don’t don’t write
50:35
to me and say can you interpret this for
50:36
me send it to your lawyer and have your
50:38
lawyer interpreted for whoever’s trying
50:40
to manage the vaccine on you
50:42
the most powerful weapon that we have
50:44
right now is that there is a core of
50:46
ethics in biomedical research that says
50:47
you cannot coerce anyone to human
50:49
subject studies
50:50
and by any definition
50:52
not only is the vaccine
50:55
even though it’s out there and people
50:56
are getting it it’s still experimental
50:59
it’s under eua
51:01
yeah the fact that they did a kind of
51:03
rubber stamp of pfizer doesn’t protect
51:05
them from the fact that post-market
51:07
surveillance is
51:08
human subjects study
51:10
but also i want to point out i want to
51:13
point out that the pcr test has never
51:14
been approved by the fda and it too is
51:17
an experimental medical procedure so
51:20
every person that has had is it would be
51:22
forced by the osha rule for instance to
51:24
get a
51:25
a pcr test is actually being coerced by
51:28
their employer
51:30
and i would like to see letters going
51:32
out from
51:33
lawyers to employers who try to enforce
51:35
that osha rule and say fine
51:37
thank you for your memo saying that you
51:39
have to vaccinate or test both are
51:40
experimental and so i’m going to sue you
51:43
for wealth
51:45
for damages psychological lost wages
51:47
whatever for issuing a coercive
51:50
memo
51:51
trying to force me into this study
51:54
of the efficacy of these tests or the
51:56
efficacy or the safety of the vaccines
51:58
it’s wrong it’s wrong it’s wrong and so
52:00
i think we’re going to win i you know
52:02
you you you call it
52:04
opposition
52:05
i don’t see what my my position is not
52:08
the opposition the opposition is this
52:11
new idea that we could just run
52:12
roughshod all over the standard
52:14
staid tried and true tenets of bioethics
52:19
they’re the opposition and they’re
52:20
losing bad
52:22
well there’s uh these institutions the
52:25
cdc and the fda
52:28
um
52:29
how i mean because most people
52:32
as i as far as i can see they’re so
52:34
respected you know their their health
52:36
authorities listen to what you’re being
52:38
told uh certainly there’s no other
52:40
agency uh that that is
52:42
uh have that has the same level of this
52:44
prestige as those institutions and so we
52:47
just do what they tell us to do but uh
52:50
what would you say uh about
52:52
how the cdc and the fda are actually uh
52:56
you know undermining human health for
52:59
the the good of profit i guess you could
53:01
say
53:02
well the first thing that i would say is
53:04
that
53:05
they used to have
53:08
prestige they used to have
53:10
kind of untouchable let’s see you know
53:12
the cdc says it must be true and that’s
53:14
all that’s gone that’s just that’s
53:16
that’s gone to the ether
53:19
there
53:19
it’s it’s amazing how many conversations
53:22
can we have with people to say oh you
53:24
know those drugs that the farmer wants
53:26
to put into grandma
53:27
it’s it’s all profit it doesn’t really
53:29
benefit you take one drug it leads to a
53:31
side effect and then the doctor gives
53:32
them another drug it leads to a side
53:33
effect and then you take another drug
53:35
for that side effect at least another
53:36
side effect and that’s why most people
53:38
who are 80 or above have about 20
53:40
different drugs with it and everyone’s
53:41
oh yeah yeah yeah that’s pharma for you
53:44
but the same exact companies put on a
53:46
vaccine in their saints
53:48
these companies actually donate
53:50
27 million a year to the cdc foundation
53:54
and the nih foundation
53:57
and most of the money for the fda comes
53:59
from fees from these drug companies to
54:01
have their drugs looked at what was the
54:03
percentage again
54:06
well most of for fda the majority of the
54:09
money that fda has the revenue comes
54:11
from fees processing fees for drug
54:14
companies to have their their their
54:16
medical products uh evaluated
54:19
um but something like 27 million dollars
54:21
goes to cdc foundation what is the cdc
54:24
foundation cdc foundation is an alleged
54:26
not-for-profit
54:28
organization that exists within the us
54:30
government how does that even work
54:33
how does how can a government have it
54:35
not for profit on it
54:36
and take donations from companies that
54:38
they’re supposed to be regulated
54:40
that doesn’t work
54:42
uh the uh
54:43
advisory committee on immunization
54:45
practices
54:46
asap which takes a vote
54:49
every year on what vaccines to add to
54:52
the vaccine schedule for children and
54:53
adults
54:55
we did a deep dive analysis with robert
54:57
f kennedy jr
54:59
um the individuals on asa
55:02
about three three or four years ago and
55:04
every single member of asap had a direct
55:07
financial conflict of interest with
55:09
pharma
55:10
they were there representing their
55:11
particular company
55:13
except for one it was the guy that was
55:15
representing the us military
55:17
so
55:18
if they take a vote and then they say
55:20
okay we’re going to prove this vaccine
55:24
uh there’s cases where we have video of
55:25
them taking the vote about the improving
55:28
the vaccine and then discussing safety
55:30
afterwards as an afterthought
55:33
there was a new adjuvant that was coming
55:34
onto a flu vaccine and they approved it
55:37
that and then somebody said yeah but i
55:38
after they voted and it was a unanimous
55:40
vote
55:42
you know it’s like a club you know you
55:43
vote against my vaccine i’m going to
55:44
vote against jewish nobody’s going to
55:46
want to vote against somebody’s vaccine
55:47
plus when you voted for a new vaccine
55:49
that opens up a market for the other
55:51
companies to throw their vaccine into
55:52
the mix too
55:54
but after the vote
55:56
they said one guy spoke up and said what
55:58
about these heart problems these people
56:00
are having
56:01
after the vote
56:03
and and so
56:05
the problem is and you can read some
56:06
about some of this in bobby kennedy’s
56:08
book right here the real anthony
56:09
thousands over your right shoulder there
56:12
um
56:12
the problem the problem is that anthony
56:15
fauci and all of these colleagues at the
56:17
niaid and all the people at cdc they’re
56:19
entitled to profit to the tune of 150
56:22
000 per year
56:24
profit
56:25
actual bona fide profit based on
56:28
technologies drugs vaccines tests
56:31
whatever that they brought forward using
56:33
taxpayer dollars is that is that fair
56:36
is it right that they can have that kind
56:38
of a personal financial conflict of
56:41
interest no it’s not right it’s not
56:43
right by any definition when i was at
56:45
the university of pittsburgh
56:47
they came into my office with a memo
56:49
they sent the member to my mailbox they
56:50
said you can’t take any pens you can’t
56:52
take any coffee mugs
56:55
you can’t take anything from anybody
56:56
that might sell something for your
56:57
laboratory
56:59
okay fine i can’t
57:01
be i can’t go out to lunch with somebody
57:03
about you know i used to be able to go
57:04
out to lunch and i would consider their
57:06
products whether i was gonna analyze
57:08
multiplex
57:10
uh you know biomarkers using luminex or
57:12
some other kind of platform or maybe i
57:14
was going to buy this kind of mass spec
57:15
or maybe that kind of sequencer i used
57:17
to be able to go out to lunch and have a
57:19
kind of social moment with them
57:21
and i would i’m not advocating for
57:22
conflicts adventures i’m totally against
57:24
it
57:25
but i’ll tell you that the person who
57:26
actually
57:27
harmonized bioethics when it came to
57:30
things like
57:31
pens and notebooks and stickers for your
57:34
refrigerator magnets for your
57:35
refrigerator
57:37
he is one of the most vaccine risk aware
57:39
people that i know
57:41
and uh
57:43
i’m dumbfounded when i did the peers
57:45
versus profits and did the other books
57:47
that i wrote i was dumbfounded at the
57:48
fact that cdc could say no we’re not
57:50
going to test your pcr or we’re not
57:52
going to test your new protein-based ass
57:55
saver ebola for instance
57:57
because we have our own and we’re in
57:58
competition with you
58:00
that that’s ludicrous
58:02
yeah
58:03
well you you’ve really kept this uh you
58:05
know the science in this argument uh i
58:08
think we’re out of time now uh but i
58:10
hope we can have you back at a later
58:12
point maybe we could you know examine
58:14
your work as it goes ahead i know you
58:15
have in 2022 uh you’re going to launch
58:18
an online comprehensive health outcomes
58:21
survey study which uh you know maybe
58:24
maybe we could chat about that uh um but
58:28
thank you thank you for bringing that up
58:29
i’d like to try to promote that actually
58:31
so the ipac
58:33
go to ipakknowledge.org and you can find
58:35
that in other initiatives that if you
58:37
want to see us you know do
58:39
comprehensive analysis of health
58:41
outcomes following covenant team
58:43
or and compare those two comprehensive
58:45
analysis of health outcomes following
58:47
the nation vaccination
58:48
uh we
58:50
can use a lot of support it’s a big
58:52
project and we really have not been able
58:54
to gain much steam with fundraising so
58:55
we need your help okay
58:57
james lyons wisely thank you so much uh
59:00
thank you michael and i’ll be happy to
59:02
come back thanks so much it was an honor
59:06
[Music]
59:08
you’re listening to the global research
59:10
newshour a program funded by the center
59:12
for research on globalization and
59:13
produced in collaboration with campus
59:15
community radio station ckuw 95.9 fm in
59:18
winnipeg on the traditional lands of the
59:20
anishinaabe inu oji cree danae and
59:23
dakota the birthplace of the metis
59:25
nation and the heart of the metis nation
59:27
homeland the show is aired on other
59:29
radio stations across canada and the
59:30
united states and available for
59:32
streaming or download at the site
59:33
globalresearch.ca
59:35
to leave feedback on this program please
59:37
email global research newshour gmail.com
59:40
i’ve been the show’s host and producer
59:41
michael welch thank you once again for
59:43
joining us
59:47
heat pack or ice pack ice pack bath or
59:50
shower bath
59:52
treat or prevent
59:53
both nurtec odt ramjapan 75 milligrams
59:57
is the first and only medication proven
59:59
to treat and prevent migraines in adults
60:02
the choice is yours don’t take if you’re
60:04
allergic to nerdtech odt the most common
60:06
side effects were nausea stomach pain
60:08
and indigestion for important safety
60:10
prescribing and patient information
60:12
visit nur nurtec.com talk to your doctor
60:15
about nurtec odt

+++

#PathogenicPriming
This report seals the deal. We nailed it in April, 2020.
(Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity https://t.co/AkRXxSc3aM)https://t.co/N4w8IQzKJJ

— James Lyons-Weiler (@lifebiomedguru) December 5, 2021

+++

How to Protect Your Health Post-Jab (Mercola and Zelenko)

+++

ipaknowledge.org

https://ipaknowledge.org › naat-evaluation-consortium.phpPrinciple Investigator: Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, Director and Scientific Director. NAATEC is an international collaboration of scientists and doctors conducting research on the evaluation of qRT-PCR testing used in the diagnosis of pathogens such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Synthetic mRNA Covid vaccines: A Risk-Benefit Analysis …

https://off-guardian.org › 2021 › ….02 › 22 › synthetic-mrnaThe voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential…This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and …

Source: https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/an-evolutionary-explanation-on-why

Why Natural Immunity is So Much Better Than Artificial Immunity

In my April 2020 analysis which introduced the world to the idea of #PathogenicPriming, I found a total of 54 immunogenic epitopes across all of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Nearly all of these epitopes had similarity to human proteins – that is, they had the capacity to induce reactogenic immunity, potentially leading to autoimmunity. Since that publication, the results were validated by researchers at Harvard University and elsewhere; the autoimmune risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 epitopes, including epitopes in the spike protein, has been laboratory-validated, and studied extensively and the number has been expanded to 79 (See Pubmed1 and Pubmed2).

By my estimation, in the spike-protein-only vaccines, all of the humoral response, that is, the adaptive immunity response, is mounted against a maximum of 5 epitopes. It’s not just that the human immune system primed to focus on the original SARS-CoV-2 spike protein will not be able to protect against variants that emerge and escape the vaccine-induced humoral response; it’s also that the vaccines themselves provide selection pressure against a very small part of a very small protein. In other words, when mutations in the spike protein arise, the act of vaccination itself will cause the emergence of – specifically the increase in frequency of – variants for which the vaccine is useless.

That’s simple Darwinian natural selection, and the epidemiologists who blame new breakthrough cases on “the variant” should stop and consider a root-cause analysis: whatever caused the variants to emerge (i.e., spread) also ultimately caused the breakthrough cases. The variant is a penultimate causal factor.

+++

Evidence of COVID Vaccine Injury – MWM | Medicine | Health …

https://www.scribd.com › document › 499314629 › Evidence-of-COVID-Vaccine-Injury-MWMThe basic argument is that the COVID-19 virus shares many epitopes with human proteins. An epitope is “the part of an antigen molecule to which an antibody attaches itself.” This means that anitbodies produced to fight a COVID-19 infection might cause harm by attacking proteins produced by the body that share the same epitopes.

Pfizer Scientist Becomes Whistle Blower Warns That All …

https://www.ldsfreedomforum.com › viewtopic.php?t=60634&start=150Epitope Homology & Molecular Mimicry James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, a biologist and genomics expert published this paper back in April 2020: “Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity.” The basic argument is that the COVID-19 virus shares many epitopes with human proteins.

+++

Click to access evidence-of-injury-mwm-1.pdf

cuttingthroughthefogcom.files.wordpress.com/2021/05/evidence-of-injury-mwm-1.pdf

+++

Epitope Homology & Molecular Mimicry

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, a biologist and genomics expert published this paper back in April 2020: “Pathogenic priming likely contributes to serious and critical illness and mortality in COVID-19 via autoimmunity.” The basic argument is that the COVID-19 virus shares many epitopes with human proteins. An epitope is “the part of an antigen molecule to which an

+++

antibody attaches itself.” This means that anitbodies produced to fight a COVID-19 infection might cause harm by attacking proteins produced by the body that share the same epitopes.The same thing could be true of COVID-19 vaccines. Lyons-Weiler wrote to the FDA and the vaccine developers early on to point out the overlap between the epitopes they included in the vaccine and natural epitopes. He urged them to use epitopes that did not overlap, but was ignored. Here is the abstract from the paper:“Homology between human and viral proteins is an established factor in viral- or vaccine-induced autoimmunity. Failure of SARS and MERS vaccines in animal trials involved pathogenesis consistent with an immunological priming that could involve autoimmunity in lung tissues due to previous exposure to the SARS and MERS spike protein. Exposure pathogenesis to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 likely will lead to similar outcomes. Immunogenic peptides in viruses or bacteria that match human proteins are good candidates for pathogenic priming peptides (similar to the more diffuse idea of “immune enhancement”). Here I provide an assessment of potential for human pathogenesis via autoimmunity via exposure, via infection or injection. SAR-CoV-2 spike proteins, and all other SARS-CoV-2 proteins, immunogenic epitopes in each SARS-CoV-2 protein were compared to human proteins in search of high local homologous matching. Only one immunogenic epitope in a SARS-CoV-2 had no homology to human proteins. If all of the parts of the epitopes that are homologous to human proteins are excluded from consideration due to risk of pathogenic priming, the remaining immunogenic parts of the epitopes may be still immunogenic and remain as potentially viable candidates for vaccine development. Mapping of the genes encoding human protein matches to pathways point to targets that could explain the observed presentation of symptoms in COVID-19 disease. It also strongly points to a large number of opportunities for expected disturbances in the immune system itself, targeting elements of MHC Class I and Class II antigen presentation, PD-1 signaling, cross-presentation of soluble exogenous antigens and the ER-Phagosome pathway. Translational consequences of these findings are explored.”

+++

His concerns received validation from a paper published in January in Frontiers in Immunology, “Reaction of Human Monoclonal Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 Proteins With Tissue Antigens: Implications for Autoimmune Diseases.” Abstract: “We sought to determine whether immune reactivity occurs between anti-SARS-CoV-2 protein antibodies and human tissue antigens, and whether molecular mimicry between COVID-19 viral proteins and human tissues could be the cause. We applied both human monoclonal anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies (spike protein, nucleoprotein) and rabbit polyclonal anti-SARS-Cov-2 antibodies (envelope protein, membrane protein) to 55 different tissue antigens. We found that SARS-CoV-2 antibodies had reactions with 28 out of 55 tissue antigens, representing a diversity of tissue groups that included barrier proteins, gastrointestinal, thyroid and neural tissues, and more. We also did selective epitope mapping using BLAST and showed similarities and homology between spike, nucleoprotein, and many other SARS-CoV-2 proteins with the human tissue antigens mitochondria M2, F-actin and TPO. This extensive immune cross-reactivity between SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and different antigen groups may play a role in the multi-system disease process of COVID-19, influence the severity of the disease, precipitate the onset of autoimmunity in susceptible subgroups, and potentially exacerbate autoimmunity in subjects that have pre-existing autoimmune diseases.Very recently, human monoclonal antibodies were approved for use on patients with COVID-19. The human monoclonal antibodies used in this study are almost identical with these approved antibodies. Thus, our results can establish the potential risk for autoimmunity and multi-system disorders with COVID-19 that may come from cross-reactivity between our own human tissues and this dreaded virus, and thus ensure that the badly-needed vaccines and treatments being developed for it are truly safe to use against this disease.”

+++